Cancer Heterogeneity and Plasticity ISSN 2818-7792

Cancer Heterogeneity and Plasticity 2026;3(3):0009 | https://doi.org/10.47248/chp2603030009

Perspective Open Access

When immune landscapes diverge: How immune cell heterogeneity shapes cancer immunotherapy response

Jessie L. Chiello 1,† , Nijamuddin Shaikh 1,† , AJ Robert McGray 1,2

  • Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
  • Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
  • These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: AJ Robert McGray

Academic Editor(s): Justin D. Lathia

Received: Mar 31, 2026 | Accepted: Jun 23, 2026 | Published: Jul 10, 2026

Cite this article: Chiello JL, Shaikh N, McGray AR. When immune landscapes diverge: How immune cell heterogeneity shapes cancer immunotherapy response. Cancer Heterog Plast. 2026;3(3):0009. https://doi.org/10.47248/chp2603030009

Abstract

Amplifying the antitumor immune response using immunotherapy has significantly improved patient survival and transformed cancer care. Findings from preclinical studies as well as clinical observations have firmly established that the intratumoral accumulation of T cells often serves as a positive predictor of immunotherapy response. While this observation has led to the commonly used “cold or hot” classifiers to describe the T cell landscape within a tumor, this is increasingly being recognized as an oversimplification. Instead, there is a growing appreciation for the broader composition, spatial localization, and dynamic nature of the tumor immune landscape across cancer types. In this perspective, we describe the diverse and unique immune correlates that have been associated with response (or lack thereof) following immunotherapy. Beginning with our own published findings related to the heterogeneous immune landscapes associated with divergent responses to adoptive T cell therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibition, we then overlay key observations from other recently published studies to highlight the impact of the broader immune landscape in determining treatment outcome. Finally, we recommend leveraging modern multi-omic analysis tools prior to and during immunotherapy treatment to define immune signatures associated with favorable response, those that can predict treatment outcome, or which can be leveraged to identify complementary therapeutic approaches.

Keywords

Tumor immune heterogeneity, Bispecific T cell engager, Adoptive T cell therapy, Multi-omics, Immune Checkpoint Blockade, Immunotherapy Response

Share this article

About Us Journals Join Us Submit Fees Contact